Thursday, August 16, 2018.
THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION
The Manafort Trial
- Dem: Trump pardoning Manafort would be grounds for impeachment
- Jury begins deliberations in Paul Manafort’s tax- and bank-fraud trial
- Manafort jury sends judge four questions, asks him to define ‘reasonable doubt’
- The Government’s Revealing Case Against Paul Manafort
- Day 13: Questions mark first day of deliberations at Manafort trial
The case is now in the hands of the jury. There was a bunch of excitement as they sent a note to the judge asking four questions.
The first was about FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Reporting) guidelines, and whether or not the rule is 50% ownership or more than 50% ownership. Judge Ellis told the jury that along with the requirement for people who own more than 50 percent of a company with foreign bank accounts, a person must file FBARs if he “controls the disposition of money, funds, or other assets held in a financial account by direct communications.”
The second question the jury asked was a clarification of the term “shelf company.” The judge couldn’t help with that one.
The third question they had was they wanted the definition of reasonable doubt. Judge Ellis responded that reasonable doubt “is a doubt based on reason,” but added: “The government is not required to prove guilt beyond all possible doubt.” Think of it like this… if Paul Manafort made a convincing argument that his tax person gave him bad advice on the filing requirements, that could be a reasonable doubt. If he claimed that it wasn’t him filling out those tax forms, but his evil twin Saul, that’s not a reasonable doubt. Sure, it is possible his evil twin Saul could forged his signatures and impersonated him, but it’s not reasonable.
Finally, they asked the judge if they could have the evidence list amended with the indictment counts for each, so they could go through it and see which evidence goes to which crime. The judge said no.
This could take a while. I don’t know when they’ll reach a verdict or announce that they’re hopelessly deadlocked, but I’ll keep you informed.
- Special counsel Robert Mueller proposes ‘well over’ 1,000 pieces of evidence for next trial of ex-Trump campaign boss Paul Manafort: Attorneys
- Trump made clear his decision to review and revoke security clearances has everything to do with the Russia investigation
- Trump blurts out another Lester Holt moment
It really was the Russia investigation all along.
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal posted late Wednesday, President Trump once again gave away the ballgame when it comes to his efforts to affect the probe and tear down its leaders (both current and former). He confessed that his true motivation for revoking former CIA director John Brennan’s security clearance was the “rigged witch hunt” that Brennan once “led.”
“I call it the rigged witch hunt; [it] is a sham,” Trump told the Journal’s Peter Nicholas and Michael C. Bender. “And these people led it!”
He added: “So I think it’s something that had to be done.”
You could be forgiven for having flashbacks to Trump’s interview with NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt in the aftermath of his firing last year of James B. Comey as FBI director. Then, as now, the White House offered a series of motivations for the crackdown on a person who was a liability in the Russia probe. Then, as now, it seemed clear what the actual motivation was. And then, as now, Trump appeared to go out and just admit the actual motivation.
There’s this thing called Consciousness of Guilt, when a person who committed a crime commits other actions with the original crime in mind. When those actions occur and are tied to doing them with the original crime in mind, they’re the actions of a guilty person.
Once again The Dotard says what’s on his mind, and what’s on his mind is Russia. How he’s going down, how Mueller’s closing in around him, and how everything and everyone around him sees how bad the situation truly is.
- Unlike Nixon, Trump admin pursues enemies list in public
- Maddow: Trump isn’t attacking critics, he’s going after witnesses
- Trump has now fired or threatened most senior officials related to the Russia investigation
Rachel Maddow brought up some great points on her show. Each and every person on the list of potential security clearance withdraws is a likely witness against Trump. They’ve seen the classified evidence against him.
However, if they don’t have a clearance, then hypothetically they wouldn’t be allowed to refer to the evidence in the case because it’s too sensitive to view. If they can’t view it, they can’t testify against Trump.
While it is something to be worried about, there are few flaws with the hypothesis.
First, this assumes that there is no publicly available evidence. One problem with classified intelligence is that it makes lousy evidence in a court because the source and chain of custody have to be exposed for it to be admissible. This is why seeing classified intelligence is very rare in a trial. Why burn an active source when publicly accessible evidence like witness testimony, emails, or phone calls and texts are available that do the same job?
Second, this also assumes that statements, interviews, and testimony before the Grand Jury have not already taken place. If so, that information is already in the hands of the courts. Removing a security clearance from someone to harm their testimony after they’ve spoken to the Grand Jury just earns Donald another count of Witness Tampering and Obstruction of Justice.
Third, this also assumes that a collusion story is the first series of charges against Trump to hit. It won’t. The first series of charges will be Obstruction-related, mostly covering the cover-up of the Russian investigation since the end of the campaign and the early part of the Trump Administration. I don’t have any inside sources on this, but if I were building a case to take down the most corrupt American in history, I’d start by removing his supporters, his base, his power, and his ability to protect himself with low-hanging fruit charges. Then, after it’s shown that he covered up some crimes, I’d go after him for the crimes he covered up.
Still, we need to keep an eye out for this. I’m hoping this is an angle that’s been wargammed by Mueller’s team as well.
Is it just me or do Trump’s action reek of desperation? Like, down by 3 touchdowns in the 4th quarter with 3 minutes left to play, throw it up and hope someone catches it desperation.
- Trump’s lawyers prepare to fight subpoena all the way to the Supreme Court
- Here’s A Complete List Of The Trump Tweets Mueller Is Likely Reviewing In Obstruction Probe – Rantt
- Did the Russian mafia help Trump along his way to the Oval Office?
- Here’s how the Russian mob used cash from a multi-billion dollar gas scam to get their hooks into Trump
- Mueller should indict Trump for obstruction before the midterms
- Papadopoulos’s wife wants him to scrap plea deal with Mueller: report | TheHill
Someone might want to tell George’s wife what would happen to him if he tried to “back out” of his plea deal.
He’s already plead guilty to lying to the FBI, which carries a maximum sentence of 5 years. They will recommend that he serve all 5 years. Next, they’d charge him will ALL of the other crimes they have him for, and that he’s admitted to. Then, after charging him, they will throw the book at him by recommending that he serve the maximum sentence for each and every crime, and that he do it consecutively, not concurrently. And, they’d also recommend that he should serve that time in the worst prison in the Federal system, with the worst of the worst.
Plus, his testimony and help has already been used and followed up on for other crimes. Everyone in the campaign will know that he ratted them out. Russian mobsters and their ilk don’t like rats.
If George listens to his wife, he’ll be lucky to die in jail an old man. Otherwise, he’ll probably get shanked by the first person he runs into in the prison yard with a vaguely European last name.
TRUMP THE RUSSIAN ASSET
The Trump administration has reportedly reversed an Obama-era framework for how and when the US can use cyber attacks against foes. President Trump undid Presidential Policy Directive 20 yesterday according to the Wall Street Journal‘s sources, and with it reversed a classified framework detailing a multi-agency process that must be followed before carrying out an attack.
The directive was put in place to prevent against bungling multi-year cyber-espionage plans that may be in motion, thus having many agencies involved with the planning process of any attack.
“It wasn’t clear what rules the administration is adopting to replace the Obama directive,” WSJ writes. “A number of current US officials confirmed the directive had been replaced but declined to comment further, citing the classified nature of the progress.”
The moves to undo the directive apparently began in April when John Bolton took up the mantle of national security advisor. The previous administration’s cybersecurity coordinator Michael Daniel described the directive to the WSJ as “designed to ensure that all appropriate equities got considered when you thought about doing an offensive cyber operation.”
There’s a worry that the directive was dismantled too quickly, and as a result people are concerned because the Trump administration hasn’t outlined its replacement to those involved. Given this administration’s history of putting laws into place seemingly without considering the consequences, coupled with Trump’s contempt for the intelligence community, the lawmakers’ concerns aren’t unfounded.
Once again, a move that helps no one but America’s enemies, executed by the Russian Agent Orange.
Brennan and Security Clearances
- Brennan: Trump worked with Russians and now he’s desperate
- Brennan: Trump worked with Russians and now he’s desperate
- Brennan: Trump worked with Russians and now he’s desperate
- A crucial point made by John Brennan – The Washington Post
- John Brennan: President Trump’s Claims of No Collusion Are Hogwash
When Alexander Bortnikov, the head of Russia’s internal security service, told me during an early August 2016 phone call that Russia wasn’t interfering in our presidential election, I knew he was lying. Over the previous several years I had grown weary of Mr. Bortnikov’s denials of Russia’s perfidy — about its mistreatment of American diplomats and citizens in Moscow, its repeated failure to adhere to cease-fire agreements in Syria and its paramilitary intervention in eastern Ukraine, to name just a few issues.
When I warned Mr. Bortnikov that Russian interference in our election was intolerable and would roil United States-Russia relations for many years, he denied Russian involvement in any election, in America or elsewhere, with a feigned sincerity that I had heard many times before. President Vladimir Putin of Russia reiterated those denials numerous times over the past two years, often to Donald Trump’s seeming approval.
Russian denials are, in a word, hogwash.
Before, during and after its now infamous meddling in our last presidential election, Russia practiced the art of shaping political events abroad through its well-honed active measures program, which employs an array of technical capabilities, information operations and old-fashioned human intelligence spycraft. Electoral politics in Western democracies presents an especially inviting target, as a variety of politicians, political parties, media outlets, think tanks and influencers are readily manipulated, wittingly and unwittingly, or even bought outright by Russian intelligence operatives. The very freedoms and liberties that liberal Western democracies cherish and that autocracies fear have been exploited by Russian intelligence services not only to collect sensitive information but also to distribute propaganda and disinformation, increasingly via the growing number of social media platforms.
Having worked closely with the F.B.I. over many years on counterintelligence investigations, I was well aware of Russia’s ability to work surreptitiously within the United States, cultivating relationships with individuals who wield actual or potential power. Like Mr. Bortnikov, these Russian operatives and agents are well trained in the art of deception. They troll political, business and cultural waters in search of gullible or unprincipled individuals who become pliant in the hands of their Russian puppet masters. Too often, those puppets are found.
In my many conversations with James Comey, the F.B.I. director, in the summer of 2016, we talked about the potential for American citizens, involved in partisan politics or not, to be pawns in Russian hands. We knew that Russian intelligence services would do all they could to achieve their objectives, which the United States intelligence community publicly assessed a few short months later were to undermine public faith in the American democratic process, harm the electability of the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton, and show preference for Mr. Trump. We also publicly assessed that Mr. Putin’s intelligence services were following his orders. Director Comey and I, along with the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael Rogers, pledged that our agencies would share, as appropriate, whatever information was collected, especially considering the proven ability of Russian intelligence services to suborn United States citizens.
The already challenging work of the American intelligence and law enforcement communities was made more difficult in late July 2016, however, when Mr. Trump, then a presidential candidate, publicly called upon Russia to find the missing emails of Mrs. Clinton. By issuing such a statement, Mr. Trump was not only encouraging a foreign nation to collect intelligence against a United States citizen, but also openly authorizing his followers to work with our primary global adversary against his political opponent.
Such a public clarion call certainly makes one wonder what Mr. Trump privately encouraged his advisers to do — and what they actually did — to win the election. While I had deep insight into Russian activities during the 2016 election, I now am aware — thanks to the reporting of an open and free press — of many more of the highly suspicious dalliances of some American citizens with people affiliated with the Russian intelligence services.
Mr. Trump’s claims of no collusion are, in a word, hogwash.
The only questions that remain are whether the collusion that took place constituted criminally liable conspiracy, whether obstruction of justice occurred to cover up any collusion or conspiracy, and how many members of “Trump Incorporated” attempted to defraud the government by laundering and concealing the movement of money into their pockets. A jury is about to deliberate bank and tax fraud charges against one of those people, Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman. And the campaign’s former deputy chairman, Rick Gates, has pleaded guilty to financial fraud and lying to investigators.
Mr. Trump clearly has become more desperate to protect himself and those close to him, which is why he made the politically motivated decision to revoke my security clearance in an attempt to scare into silence others who might dare to challenge him. Now more than ever, it is critically important that the special counsel, Robert Mueller, and his team of investigators be allowed to complete their work without interference — from Mr. Trump or anyone else — so that all Americans can get the answers they so rightly deserve.
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders told Trump to announce Brennan punishment to distract from Omarosa book
- Giiddyheyde: Putin pal Artem Klyushin tweeted out the list of security clearances to be revoked 2 days before the July 26 th WH memo
- Artem Klyushin from July 24
Check out those tweets above. How did a pal of Putin know about these ahead of time?
- Graham: Flynn should lose security clearance
- Revoke my security clearance, too, Mr. President
- I led the bin Laden raid. Now I want my security clearance revoked, too.
- Admiral who oversaw Bin Laden raid to Trump: ‘Revoke my security clearance, as well’
The Admiral in charge of Seal Team Six is speaking up against Trump. That is nuts.
I’m waiting for the inevitable Fox News hitpiece on McRaven. Not because I want to see it, but they only have one play to run now. Kiss Trump’s ass at all costs.
- Trump made clear his decision to review and revoke security clearances has everything to do with the Russia investigation
- Unlike Nixon, Trump admin pursues enemies list in public
- Trump cites Russia probe as motivation for revoking former CIA director’s clearance
- Trump gears up to strip more clearances from officials tied to Russia investigation
- Trump has now fired or threatened most senior officials related to the Russia investigation
- Maddow: Trump isn’t attacking critics, he’s going after witnesses
Press
- Trump responds after hundreds of newspaper editorials criticize his attacks on the press
- Trump Says Newspapers Are in ‘Collusion’ on Championing a Free Press
Military Parade
- Trump will get his absurd military parade — thanks to Republicans who indulge his egomania
- Trump’s big military parade will reportedly cost $80 million more than expected
- Trump’s military parade is estimated to cost $92 million – $80 million more than earlier estimate
- Donald Trump’s Military Parade Could Feed Every Homeless Veteran for Almost 9 Months, Based on Reported New Cost
- Manu Raju: Statement from the American Legion
- Pentagon may delay Trump’s military parade, originally slated for November, to next year
- Pentagon says it’s postponing Trump’s military parade
- Pentagon says Trump’s proposed military parade, originally planned for for Veterans Day, delayed at least until 2019
The Military Parade is “delayed.” Good, this whole parade is a stupid idea. America is the big swinging dick of the world. When you’ve got the biggest dick, you don’t need to whip it out. Only the schmuck that’s hung like a snail feels the need to brag about how big their dick is.
That’s enough dick talk. Time to class it up a bit.
THE OMAROSA TAPES
- Trump wants Omarosa arrested.
- DCpoll: Omarosa secretly recorded her phone call with Lara Trump immediately following her firing in which Lara Trump offers her $15K per month hush money which would be financed via “small donors for the most part.” ‘Small donors’ ==> that’s YOU, MAGA fools.
- Kyle Griffin: Omarosa could have more than 200 tapes
- Omarosa Manigault Newman releases secret recording of $15,000-a-month job offer from Lara Trump
- Omarosa releases recording of $15,000-a-month job offer from Lara Trump
- Omarosa releases secret tape of Lara Trump offering her $15K/month campaign job
- Omarosa: I have even more tapes from inside Trump’s White House
Really? I said class it up.
So there’s more than 200 tapes of conversations with pretty much everyone, and the one she posted with Lara Trump sounds like it’s either awfully close to a campaign finance violation, or a blatant bribe and hush money attempt. Probably both.
I can’t believe I’m going to say this, but I’m looking forward to the next collection of WTF to come from her. I’ve questioned her morals, ethics, fashion sense, and whether or not she’s a fire-breathing dragon, but I haven’t questioned her intelligence. Don’t get me wrong, she’s evil, but she’s also smart enough, evil enough, and vengeful enough to play Trump’s game.
TRAITOR TOTS
- Michael Cohen reportedly balked at paying off Stormy Daniels until the ‘Access Hollywood’ tape was released — and that could cut through his and Trump’s defense
- It Looks Like the Hush Money to Stormy Daniels Might Be a Big-Time Campaign Finance Violation After All
The Wall Street Journal reported something interesting today about Michael Cohen: back in September 2016, Stormy Daniels’ lawyer contacted him about making a hush money payment to keep Stormy quiet about her affair with Trump. Cohen told him to pound sand.
But a few weeks later, the Access Hollywood “grab ’em by the pussy” tape became public and Stormy’s lawyer decided to give Cohen another call. Sure enough, suddenly he was interested in cutting a deal. This suggests that the $130,000 payment they eventually agreed on wasn’t meant, say, to keep the affair secret from Melania. After all, why would you be indifferent about that in September but suddenly care deeply about it in October? Election law expert Rick Hasen explains what this means:
The Journal reports federal prosecutors view the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape as the “trigger” for Cohen’s payments to Daniels.That’s a big deal. Two important Republican election lawyers have attempted to set a high bar for how to tell when a payment in this context might be campaign-related rather than personal.
Charlie Spies told the Journal in February that the payment to Daniels was “an expense that would exist irrespective of whether Mr. Trump was a candidate and therefore should not be treated as a campaign contribution.” And former Federal Election Commission chair Brad Smith wrote in an April op-ed in the Journal that “FEC regulations explain that the campaign cannot pay expenses that would exist ‘irrespective’ of the campaign, even if it might help win election. At the same time, obligations that would not exist ‘but for’ the campaign must be paid from campaign funds.”
In other words, this is evidence that the $130,000 payment wasn’t“irrespective” of Trump’s campaign. The campaign was in full swing in September and Cohen didn’t care, but as soon as the Access Hollywood tape increased the damage that Stormy Daniels could do, he cared a lot. If a jury agrees, this becomes a serious, full-blown campaign finance violation. And all the evidence suggests that Trump knew about it.
FIGHTING BACK
The Press Is Not The Enemy
- S.E. Cupp: The Press is the enemy of only one person
- NBC Politics: U.S. Senate: The Press is not the enemy of the people
- Senate unanimously adopts resolution declaring “the press is not the enemy of the people”
- The Senate unanimously passed a resolution rebuking Trump’s statement that the news media is ‘the enemy of the people’
- Bomb threat made at Boston Globe after editorial condemning Trump
- Trump accuses Boston Globe of ‘collusion with other papers’ amid coordinated pushback to his rhetoric toward media
- My father, Ronald Reagan, would never have stood for this
Those of us who are horrified by the vilification of the news media, those of us who cringe at the sight of angry mobs jeering at the cordoned-off journalists at Trump rallies, far outnumber those who are swept up by this ugly passion. We are still in the majority. But if we are silent, if we don’t speak up, if we don’t raise our voices and say, “This is not America,” it won’t matter that we are in the majority. Silence didn’t create this country; brazen, unwavering commitment did. And one of those commitments was to a free press — one not controlled or hampered by a demagogue who has a good day only when he’s being flattered.
See the bottom of this post for my thoughts on The Press.
Security Clearances
- Revoke my security clearance, too, Mr. President
- I led the bin Laden raid. Now I want my security clearance revoked, too.
- Admiral who oversaw Bin Laden raid to Trump: ‘Revoke my security clearance, as well’
- ‘You have embarrassed us in the eyes of our children’: Navy SEAL who oversaw the Osama bin Laden raid rebukes Trump in stunning opinion column
- Donald Trump’s compelling argument for revoking the security clearance of . . . Donald Trump
- Press Release | U.S. Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina
IMMIGRATION
- Michael Avenatti: There are approx 56 Guatemalan children in Houston and McAllen (in custody) who were separated from their parents at the border. We are working on gaining their release to me so that I can fly them home ASAP to their parents. This mess needs to be cleaned-up NOW. #Basta
- ACLU Lawsuit about immigrant children
- An ICE attorney forged a document to deport an immigrant. ICE didn’t care until the immigrant sued.
- HHS official: Agency isn’t able to ensure safety of migrant kids after they leave care
- Border inspector, former ICE agent face felony cases in California
- ICE Orders Dozens of Straitjacket-Like Restraints – TYT Network
COLD WAR 2.0
- Trump administration is considering pulling back $3 billion in foreign aid
- White House Takes Aim At Financial Protections For Military : NPR
#NEVERAGAIN
THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE
- MSNBC analyst: ‘Virtually certain’ 10 percent of GOP would say it’s OK for Trump to ‘kill my parents’
- On Fox News, Robert Mueller is often a bigger bogeyman than Vladimir Putin
- No, one-third of African Americans don’t support Trump. Not even close.
- Most Trump officials on TV apparently signed NDAs prohibiting them from disparaging Trump forever
- Ajit Pai knew DDoS claim was false in January, says he couldn’t tell Congress
TRADE WAR AND ECONOMY
SCOTUS
- Manu Raju: Brett Kavanaugh Poll
- CNN Poll: Brett Kavanaugh nomination has lowest public support since Robert Bork
WHITE HOUSE CHAOS
- Edward Hardy: Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White is under review by the Department of Defence’s Inspector General for allegedly forcing her staff to run personal errands and for removing staff who complained about her
- Pentagon Spending $34M to Make Presidential Jets More Posh – Defense One
- Melania Trump to speak at cyberbullying summit next week | TheHill
- White House Takes Aim At Financial Protections For Military : NPR
GOP: THE PARTY OF LINCOLN IS DEAD
- Republicans are enabling Trump’s authoritarianism. These clips prove it.
- Republicans Don’t Just Want to Win—They Want to Rig the Game
- A Holocaust denier is running for Congress. One of his constituents would be Auschwitz prisoner No. 27,276.
- Republican who compared gay people to rapists will face lesbian election opponent
- Kellyanne Conway Wanted To Criticize Her Husband — But As An Anonymous Source
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT
- Norm Eisen: CREW filed lawsuit against Wilbur Ross
- NYAG: Federal Judge Upheld Clean Water Rules
- Woman Fired for ‘F—ing Mexicans’ Comment Defends Remark as Normal Workplace Talk After Trump’s Election
- Rash of overdoses show dangers of powerful synthetic drugs
Pedophile Priests
- U.S. bishops say church needs lay Catholics to help address ‘moral catastrophe’
- Jake Tapper: Is Pennsylvania the only state in the nation that has done a full investigation into predator priests and the coverup thereof? Given what that Pennsylvania grand jury and @JoshShapiroPA found, shouldn’t every state AG now be doing this?
- Cardinal Wuerl must go
ELECTION 2018
- A Holocaust denier is running for Congress. One of his constituents would be Auschwitz prisoner No. 27,276.
- Republican who compared gay people to rapists will face lesbian election opponent
- Beto O’Rourke: Term limits can help keep politicians from turning into a–holes
- Vote Save America
PROGRESS IS PROGRESS
QUEEN OF SOUL
- Aretha Franklin, music’s ‘Queen of Soul,’ dies at 76
- Aretha Franklin’s voice was the sound of an America we’re still trying to become
- Fox News Is Trash: Network Celebrates Life of Aretha Franklin With Photo of Patti Labelle
- Fox News Mistakes Patti LaBelle for Aretha Franklin – The Daily Beast
- My favorite Aretha Franklin performance
RUMOR MILL
That’s it for Thursday. As promised, below are my thoughts about The Press.
The Press is not the enemy of the people. It has many enemies, but the people are not one of them.
The Press is the enemy of the corrupt, the abusive, and the power-hungry.
The Press is the enemy of the status quo that accepts complacency and corruption in their lives.
The Press is the enemy of ignorance.
The Press is the enemy of bigotry, racism, misogyny, and hate.
The Press is the enemy of those that would use the above to distract the otherwise vigilant while they consolidate their power.
The Press is the enemy of the Propagandist, the one who spins a story to meet their goals.
The Press is the enemy of the Liar, who can only exist as long as they control the narrative.
The Press is the enemy of the Criminal, who depends on secrets to thrive.
The Press is the enemy of the Bully, who needs to project an image of toughness.
The Press is the enemy of the Hypocrite, who can’t have anyone know about their past.
The Press is the enemy of the Tyrant, who demands absolute loyalty from all.
In other words…
The Press is the enemy of Donald J. Trump.
Thank you, and have a good one.
“Without Journalists, it’s just propaganda.”
– Katy Tur
Shew, that’s a LOT to unpack! I am also on board with your assessment of Omarosa. This is more drama than the old DALLAS tv series. 😉
LikeLike